USA Firmware vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
USA Firmware (4.2/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. USA Firmware is the better choice for hardware startups needing firmware, FPGA, and Linux from one small team. Very is the stronger option for distributed-delivery IoT programs needing firmware plus data and ML. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
USA Firmware vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | USA Firmware | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| HQ | Brecksville, Ohio, USA | Bozeman, Montana, USA (fully distributed team) |
| Team size | 17 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Managed design services blending electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and embedded Linux for connected-product companies | Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions |
| Pricing model | Managed design engagements across discovery, design, prototyping, and production enablement | IoT product development engagements from concept through deployment |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, FPGA design, Embedded Linux | Embedded C/C++, IoT connectivity stacks, Machine learning data pipelines |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Commercial products, Healthcare devices | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
USA Firmware vs Very: overview
USA Firmware
USA Firmware was founded in 2011 by CEO Bob Scaccia and is based in Brecksville, Ohio, with roughly 17 employees across North America and Asia. The firm's managed design services combine electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA design, and embedded Linux for consumer, commercial, and healthcare product companies, and it appeared on Inc. magazine's Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies. Its small team size keeps engagements senior-led, though it also caps the number of large programs it can run in parallel.
Very
Very, formerly known by a different name, was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Bozeman, Montana, operating as a fully distributed team of 51 to 200 people working from numerous countries rather than from central offices. The firm builds connected ecosystems spanning IoT hardware, firmware, and software infrastructure, plus interface design and machine-learning-driven data solutions built on top of device data. Very has appeared on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies multiple times, a verifiable third-party growth signal distinct from marketing claims.
Services and capabilities: USA Firmware vs Very
| Capability | USA Firmware | Very |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: USA Firmware vs Very
| Framework / platform | USA Firmware | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: USA Firmware vs Very
| Criterion | USA Firmware | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: USA Firmware vs Very
| Dimension | USA Firmware | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Commercial products, Healthcare devices | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
| Best use cases | Connected consumer product needing firmware and electrical engineering from one small team, FPGA-based design requiring integration with embedded Linux firmware | IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis, Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
USA Firmware vs Very: pros and cons
| USA Firmware | |
|---|---|
| + | Named on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies, a verifiable third-party growth signal |
| + | Covers electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA design, and embedded Linux under one managed process |
| + | Small team of about 17 keeps engagements senior-led throughout |
| - | A team of roughly 17 caps how many large programs can run in parallel |
| - | Limited public case-study detail beyond the company's own site |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal |
| + | Fully distributed team structure can draw specialist talent regardless of location |
| + | Combines firmware delivery with data solutions and machine learning on top of device telemetry |
| - | Fully distributed structure means no central office for in-person collaboration during an engagement |
| - | Montana headquarters is a smaller regional base than most firms' US locations on this list |
Who should choose USA Firmware?
A typical fit: connected consumer product needing firmware and electrical engineering from one small team.
Managed design services blending electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and embedded Linux for connected-product companies. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Commercial products, Healthcare devices.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis.
Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure.
Decision matrix: USA Firmware vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | USA Firmware |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Very |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: USA Firmware (Not published) vs Very (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | USA Firmware |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: USA Firmware vs Very
| Use case | USA Firmware fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connected consumer product needing firmware and electrical engineering from one small team | Strong | Limited | USA Firmware |
| FPGA-based design requiring integration with embedded Linux firmware | Strong | Limited | USA Firmware |
| IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: USA Firmware vs Very
USA Firmware (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Managed design services blending electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and embedded Linux for connected-product companies.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
USA Firmware vs Very FAQ
Is USA Firmware better than Very?
USA Firmware (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. USA Firmware's strongest advantage: named on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies, a verifiable third-party growth signal. Very's strongest advantage: repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal.
How do USA Firmware and Very differ in pricing?
USA Firmware uses managed design engagements across discovery, design, prototyping, and production enablement pricing. Very uses iot product development engagements from concept through deployment pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: USA Firmware or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between USA Firmware and Very?
USA Firmware's primary differentiator is: managed design services blending electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and embedded Linux for connected-product companies. Very's primary differentiator is: fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. They also differ in team size (17 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Commercial products vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.