Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of Dojo Five (4.5/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS firmware needing secure boot and direct chip-vendor partnerships. Dojo Five is the stronger option for teams wanting automated firmware CI/CD instead of manual builds. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2018 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 26 |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing | Built specifically around bringing modern CI/CD, automated testing, and monitoring pipelines to embedded firmware teams |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or team extension/staff augmentation | Firmware engineering and DevOps-style tooling consulting |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, On-premise and cloud CI/CD |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Industrial equipment, Medical devices, Consumer electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team builds RTOS and bare-metal firmware on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, alongside secure boot, OTA update pipelines, and MISRA-aware testing for regulated clients. It holds direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip as primary semiconductor partners, plus an in-house lab with oscilloscopes and hardware-in-the-loop testing for board bring-up. Public case studies include a KONVOI truck security firmware audit and a Caltech medical device port to STM32, and the company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications with full IP transfer to the client on delivery.
Dojo Five
Dojo Five was founded in 2018 and is based in Saint Paul, Minnesota, with a team of roughly 26 people. Rather than positioning as a general embedded firm, the company markets itself specifically around modernizing the firmware development lifecycle: automated builds, hardware-in-the-loop testing, and monitoring pipelines that most older firmware vendors still handle manually. That focus means Dojo Five is a better fit for a team that already has a codebase and needs tooling and process discipline than for a from-scratch product build.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics | Industrial equipment, Medical devices, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | Security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline, Secure OTA update pipeline for a fleet of connected industrial devices | Existing firmware codebase with no automated test coverage or CI pipeline, Medical device team needing automated regression testing ahead of a compliance audit |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip back up semiconductor-level claims instead of a generic all-chips pitch |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing capability covers board bring-up work most pure-firmware vendors outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing suit regulated industrial and medical firmware |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named case studies span automotive security auditing, medical device porting, and industrial telemetry rather than one vertical |
| - | Does not manufacture finished devices or handle mass production in-house |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf; the client or a third party owns that process |
| - | Minimum engagement size is not published, so budget fit requires a direct conversation |
| Dojo Five | |
|---|---|
| + | Specific focus on firmware CI/CD and automated testing addresses a gap most other firms on this list treat as an afterthought |
| + | Team of 26 keeps every engagement senior-engineer-led rather than staffed with junior generalists |
| + | Modern tooling background reduces the manual regression-testing burden common at older firmware vendors |
| - | Team of 26 limits capacity for very large, multi-year programs |
| - | Founded in 2018, so its public track record is shorter than firms with decades of delivery history |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose Dojo Five?
A typical fit: existing firmware codebase with no automated test coverage or CI pipeline.
Built specifically around bringing modern CI/CD, automated testing, and monitoring pipelines to embedded firmware teams. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Medical devices, Consumer electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Dojo Five |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Dojo Five |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Dojo Five (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Dojo Five fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Secure OTA update pipeline for a fleet of connected industrial devices | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Existing firmware codebase with no automated test coverage or CI pipeline | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Medical device team needing automated regression testing ahead of a compliance audit | Limited | Strong | Dojo Five |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing.
Dojo Five (4.5/5) is worth a look if you need medical device team needing automated regression testing ahead of a compliance audit. If your situation matches that, Dojo Five is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Dojo Five?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip back up semiconductor-level claims instead of a generic all-chips pitch. Dojo Five's strongest advantage: specific focus on firmware CI/CD and automated testing addresses a gap most other firms on this list treat as an afterthought.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Dojo Five differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or team extension/staff augmentation pricing. Dojo Five uses firmware engineering and devops-style tooling consulting pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Dojo Five?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Dojo Five?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing. Dojo Five's primary differentiator is: built specifically around bringing modern CI/CD, automated testing, and monitoring pipelines to embedded firmware teams. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 26), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging) vs Industrial equipment, Medical devices).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.