Sii Poland vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Sii Poland (3.9/5) overall. Very is the better choice for distributed-delivery IoT programs needing firmware plus data and ML. Sii Poland is the stronger option for large enterprise programs needing hundreds of embedded engineers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sii Poland vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sii Poland | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | Bozeman, Montana, USA (fully distributed team) |
| Team size | 7,500+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | One of Central Europe's largest engineering and IT services firms, with embedded systems as a dedicated practice | Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions |
| Pricing model | Staff augmentation and fixed-scope engineering engagements | IoT product development engagements from concept through deployment |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Automotive embedded platforms, Enterprise integration tooling | Embedded C/C++, IoT connectivity stacks, Machine learning data pipelines |
| Industries served | Automotive, Telecommunications, Enterprise IT | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
Sii Poland vs Very: overview
Sii Poland
Sii Poland was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, reporting more than 7,500 specialists company-wide. Firmware and embedded systems R&D form a dedicated practice within a much larger IT services and engineering business that also covers automotive, telecom, and enterprise software, positioning Sii as a scale option for programs that need large, sustained staffing rather than a boutique specialist team. That scale is the firm's clearest advantage and also its clearest trade-off: a small firmware project competes for attention against far larger enterprise accounts.
Very
Very, formerly known by a different name, was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Bozeman, Montana, operating as a fully distributed team of 51 to 200 people working from numerous countries rather than from central offices. The firm builds connected ecosystems spanning IoT hardware, firmware, and software infrastructure, plus interface design and machine-learning-driven data solutions built on top of device data. Very has appeared on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies multiple times, a verifiable third-party growth signal distinct from marketing claims.
Services and capabilities: Sii Poland vs Very
| Capability | Sii Poland | Very |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Sii Poland vs Very
| Framework / platform | Sii Poland | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sii Poland vs Very
| Criterion | Sii Poland | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Staff augmentation, Fixed project | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sii Poland vs Very
| Dimension | Sii Poland | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Telecommunications, Enterprise IT | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
| Best use cases | Large automotive or telecom program needing sustained embedded staff augmentation, Enterprise client consolidating firmware work under an existing large IT vendor relationship | IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis, Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design |
| Typical project type | Staff augmentation | Fixed project |
Sii Poland vs Very: pros and cons
| Sii Poland | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 7,500 specialists company-wide gives significant staffing depth for large or urgent programs |
| + | Dedicated firmware and embedded systems R&D practice within a much larger engineering organization |
| + | Two decades of operating history with established delivery processes |
| - | Scale means a small firmware project may receive less senior attention than at a boutique firm |
| - | Embedded work is one of many practice areas rather than the firm's primary specialization |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal |
| + | Fully distributed team structure can draw specialist talent regardless of location |
| + | Combines firmware delivery with data solutions and machine learning on top of device telemetry |
| - | Fully distributed structure means no central office for in-person collaboration during an engagement |
| - | Montana headquarters is a smaller regional base than most firms' US locations on this list |
Who should choose Sii Poland?
A typical fit: large automotive or telecom program needing sustained embedded staff augmentation.
One of Central Europe's largest engineering and IT services firms, with embedded systems as a dedicated practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecommunications, Enterprise IT.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis.
Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure.
Decision matrix: Sii Poland vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sii Poland |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Very |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sii Poland (Not published) vs Very (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sii Poland |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Sii Poland |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Sii Poland vs Very
| Use case | Sii Poland fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large automotive or telecom program needing sustained embedded staff augmentation | Strong | Limited | Sii Poland |
| Enterprise client consolidating firmware work under an existing large IT vendor relationship | Strong | Limited | Sii Poland |
| IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Strong | Limited | Sii Poland |
Verdict: Sii Poland vs Very
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions.
Sii Poland (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need enterprise client consolidating firmware work under an existing large IT vendor relationship. If your situation matches that, Sii Poland is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sii Poland vs Very FAQ
Is Sii Poland better than Very?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sii Poland's strongest advantage: more than 7,500 specialists company-wide gives significant staffing depth for large or urgent programs. Very's strongest advantage: repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal.
How do Sii Poland and Very differ in pricing?
Sii Poland uses staff augmentation and fixed-scope engineering engagements pricing. Very uses iot product development engagements from concept through deployment pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sii Poland or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sii Poland and Very?
Sii Poland's primary differentiator is: one of Central Europe's largest engineering and IT services firms, with embedded systems as a dedicated practice. Very's primary differentiator is: fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. They also differ in team size (7,500+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Telecommunications vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.