L&T Technology Services vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of L&T Technology Services (3.9/5) overall. Very is the better choice for distributed-delivery IoT programs needing firmware plus data and ML. L&T Technology Services is the stronger option for the largest enterprise embedded programs needing conglomerate-scale resources. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
L&T Technology Services vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | L&T Technology Services | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| HQ | Vadodara, Gujarat, India | Bozeman, Montana, USA (fully distributed team) |
| Team size | 23,800+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Publicly listed engineering R&D subsidiary of the Larsen & Toubro conglomerate, with embedded systems as one major business line | Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions |
| Pricing model | Large-scale engineering research and development contracts | IoT product development engagements from concept through deployment |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Semiconductor engineering tooling, Industrial IoT platforms | Embedded C/C++, IoT connectivity stacks, Machine learning data pipelines |
| Industries served | Automotive, Industrial IoT, Manufacturing plant engineering | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
L&T Technology Services vs Very: overview
L&T Technology Services
L&T Technology Services was established as an independent entity in 2009, evolving from L&T Integrated Engineering Services founded in 2006, and is headquartered at L&T Knowledge City in Vadodara, India; the company reports more than 23,800 employees across 31 global sales offices and 98 innovation labs. As a subsidiary of the Larsen & Toubro conglomerate and a publicly listed engineering research and development firm, embedded systems and semiconductor engineering form one of several major business lines alongside automotive engineering, industrial IoT, and plant engineering. Its scale is unmatched by any other firm on this list, which suits the largest enterprise programs but leaves less room for the hands-on senior attention a small firmware team competes for elsewhere.
Very
Very, formerly known by a different name, was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Bozeman, Montana, operating as a fully distributed team of 51 to 200 people working from numerous countries rather than from central offices. The firm builds connected ecosystems spanning IoT hardware, firmware, and software infrastructure, plus interface design and machine-learning-driven data solutions built on top of device data. Very has appeared on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies multiple times, a verifiable third-party growth signal distinct from marketing claims.
Services and capabilities: L&T Technology Services vs Very
| Capability | L&T Technology Services | Very |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: L&T Technology Services vs Very
| Framework / platform | L&T Technology Services | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: L&T Technology Services vs Very
| Criterion | L&T Technology Services | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Staff augmentation, Managed programs | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: L&T Technology Services vs Very
| Dimension | L&T Technology Services | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Industrial IoT, Manufacturing plant engineering | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
| Best use cases | Enterprise-scale automotive or industrial program requiring conglomerate-level engineering resources, Multi-year embedded systems program needing sustained large-team staffing | IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis, Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
L&T Technology Services vs Very: pros and cons
| L&T Technology Services | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 23,800 employees and 98 innovation labs make it the largest-scale option on this list by a wide margin |
| + | Publicly listed subsidiary of the Larsen & Toubro conglomerate provides significant financial backing and stability |
| + | Embedded and semiconductor engineering is a formal, well-resourced business line rather than an incidental capability |
| - | Scale and conglomerate structure mean less hands-on senior attention than a small firmware boutique offers |
| - | Firmware work sits inside several other large business lines rather than as a dedicated specialist practice |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal |
| + | Fully distributed team structure can draw specialist talent regardless of location |
| + | Combines firmware delivery with data solutions and machine learning on top of device telemetry |
| - | Fully distributed structure means no central office for in-person collaboration during an engagement |
| - | Montana headquarters is a smaller regional base than most firms' US locations on this list |
Who should choose L&T Technology Services?
A typical fit: enterprise-scale automotive or industrial program requiring conglomerate-level engineering resources.
Publicly listed engineering R&D subsidiary of the Larsen & Toubro conglomerate, with embedded systems as one major business line. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial IoT, Manufacturing plant engineering.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis.
Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure.
Decision matrix: L&T Technology Services vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | L&T Technology Services |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Very |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: L&T Technology Services (Not published) vs Very (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | L&T Technology Services |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | L&T Technology Services |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: L&T Technology Services vs Very
| Use case | L&T Technology Services fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise-scale automotive or industrial program requiring conglomerate-level engineering resources | Strong | Limited | L&T Technology Services |
| Multi-year embedded systems program needing sustained large-team staffing | Strong | Limited | L&T Technology Services |
| IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Strong | Limited | L&T Technology Services |
Verdict: L&T Technology Services vs Very
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions.
L&T Technology Services (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need multi-year embedded systems program needing sustained large-team staffing. If your situation matches that, L&T Technology Services is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
L&T Technology Services vs Very FAQ
Is L&T Technology Services better than Very?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. L&T Technology Services's strongest advantage: more than 23,800 employees and 98 innovation labs make it the largest-scale option on this list by a wide margin. Very's strongest advantage: repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal.
How do L&T Technology Services and Very differ in pricing?
L&T Technology Services uses large-scale engineering research and development contracts pricing. Very uses iot product development engagements from concept through deployment pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: L&T Technology Services or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between L&T Technology Services and Very?
L&T Technology Services's primary differentiator is: publicly listed engineering R&D subsidiary of the Larsen & Toubro conglomerate, with embedded systems as one major business line. Very's primary differentiator is: fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. They also differ in team size (23,800+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Industrial IoT vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.