Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of Timesys (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS firmware needing secure boot and direct chip-vendor partnerships. Timesys is the stronger option for embedded Linux security hardening and long-term platform maintenance. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1996 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing | One of the original embedded Linux specialists, now backed by Lynx Software Technologies' broader platform resources |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or team extension/staff augmentation | Engineering services and development tools for embedded Linux platforms |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | Embedded Linux, Android, Yocto |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Networking equipment, Industrial systems, Consumer electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team builds RTOS and bare-metal firmware on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, alongside secure boot, OTA update pipelines, and MISRA-aware testing for regulated clients. It holds direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip as primary semiconductor partners, plus an in-house lab with oscilloscopes and hardware-in-the-loop testing for board bring-up. Public case studies include a KONVOI truck security firmware audit and a Caltech medical device port to STM32, and the company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications with full IP transfer to the client on delivery.
Timesys
Timesys was founded in 1996 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, by principals associated with Carnegie Mellon University, and shipped one of the first real-time-enhanced embedded Linux distributions. In December 2023, Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys, and the roughly 60-person team now operates under that ownership building, securing, and maintaining embedded Linux, Android, and open-source platform software. The acquisition means product roadmap and support decisions now run through Lynx rather than an independent Timesys leadership team, which is worth factoring into a long-term vendor relationship.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Ongoing platform maintenance |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics | Networking equipment, Industrial systems, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | Security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline, Secure OTA update pipeline for a fleet of connected industrial devices | Long-term security maintenance for an existing embedded Linux platform, Legacy embedded Linux distribution needing a modern, supported refresh |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip back up semiconductor-level claims instead of a generic all-chips pitch |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing capability covers board bring-up work most pure-firmware vendors outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing suit regulated industrial and medical firmware |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named case studies span automotive security auditing, medical device porting, and industrial telemetry rather than one vertical |
| - | Does not manufacture finished devices or handle mass production in-house |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf; the client or a third party owns that process |
| - | Minimum engagement size is not published, so budget fit requires a direct conversation |
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly three decades of embedded Linux specialization dating back to 1996 |
| + | 2023 acquisition by Lynx Software Technologies adds parent-company resources and platform roadmap access |
| + | Deep focus on Linux security hardening and long-term maintenance rather than one-off builds |
| - | The 2023 acquisition by Lynx means product and support decisions now run through a parent company rather than independent Timesys leadership |
| - | Embedded Linux focus is a narrower fit for bare-metal or RTOS-first firmware projects |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: long-term security maintenance for an existing embedded Linux platform.
One of the original embedded Linux specialists, now backed by Lynx Software Technologies' broader platform resources. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Networking equipment, Industrial systems, Consumer electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Timesys |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Timesys (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Timesys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Secure OTA update pipeline for a fleet of connected industrial devices | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Long-term security maintenance for an existing embedded Linux platform | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Legacy embedded Linux distribution needing a modern, supported refresh | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing.
Timesys (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need legacy embedded Linux distribution needing a modern, supported refresh. If your situation matches that, Timesys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip back up semiconductor-level claims instead of a generic all-chips pitch. Timesys's strongest advantage: nearly three decades of embedded Linux specialization dating back to 1996.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Timesys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or team extension/staff augmentation pricing. Timesys uses engineering services and development tools for embedded linux platforms pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Timesys?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing. Timesys's primary differentiator is: one of the original embedded Linux specialists, now backed by Lynx Software Technologies' broader platform resources. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging) vs Networking equipment, Industrial systems).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.