Embien Technologies vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Embien Technologies (4.2/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. Embien Technologies is the better choice for consumer or industrial devices needing custom embedded GUI work. Very is the stronger option for distributed-delivery IoT programs needing firmware plus data and ML. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Embien Technologies vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Embien Technologies | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
| HQ | Madurai, India (also Palatine, Illinois, USA) | Bozeman, Montana, USA (fully distributed team) |
| Team size | 63 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Builds its own GUI library and IoT device-management platform, giving it deeper tooling than a pure services vendor | Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions |
| Pricing model | Product engineering and digital transformation services | IoT product development engagements from concept through deployment |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Flint IDE, Sparklet GUI library | Embedded C/C++, IoT connectivity stacks, Machine learning data pipelines |
| Industries served | Automotive, Industrial automation, Medical, Consumer electronics, Defense | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
Embien Technologies vs Very: overview
Embien Technologies
Embien Technologies was founded in 2010 in Madurai, India, and also maintains a US office in Palatine, Illinois; the company reports roughly 63 employees. Beyond contract embedded software development, Embien maintains its own products, including the Flint IDE, the Sparklet GUI library, and the SkyCase IoT device-management platform, which gives it deeper internal tooling than a pure services vendor relying only on third-party libraries. Client industries span automotive, industrial automation, medical, consumer electronics, and defense, a genuinely broad spread for a team of this size.
Very
Very, formerly known by a different name, was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Bozeman, Montana, operating as a fully distributed team of 51 to 200 people working from numerous countries rather than from central offices. The firm builds connected ecosystems spanning IoT hardware, firmware, and software infrastructure, plus interface design and machine-learning-driven data solutions built on top of device data. Very has appeared on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies multiple times, a verifiable third-party growth signal distinct from marketing claims.
Services and capabilities: Embien Technologies vs Very
| Capability | Embien Technologies | Very |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Embien Technologies vs Very
| Framework / platform | Embien Technologies | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Embien Technologies vs Very
| Criterion | Embien Technologies | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Embien Technologies vs Very
| Dimension | Embien Technologies | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Industrial automation, Medical | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
| Best use cases | Embedded device requiring a custom touchscreen GUI, IoT product needing a device-management platform alongside firmware | IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis, Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Embien Technologies vs Very: pros and cons
| Embien Technologies | |
|---|---|
| + | Maintains proprietary GUI and IoT tooling rather than relying solely on third-party libraries |
| + | Serves a genuinely broad industry spread from automotive to defense |
| + | US office in Illinois gives an on-shore point of contact alongside the India engineering base |
| - | 63 employees is a small team relative to the breadth of industries served |
| - | Independent, third-party verification of specific claims and figures is limited |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal |
| + | Fully distributed team structure can draw specialist talent regardless of location |
| + | Combines firmware delivery with data solutions and machine learning on top of device telemetry |
| - | Fully distributed structure means no central office for in-person collaboration during an engagement |
| - | Montana headquarters is a smaller regional base than most firms' US locations on this list |
Who should choose Embien Technologies?
A typical fit: embedded device requiring a custom touchscreen GUI.
Builds its own GUI library and IoT device-management platform, giving it deeper tooling than a pure services vendor. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial automation, Medical, Consumer electronics, Defense.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis.
Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure.
Decision matrix: Embien Technologies vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Embien Technologies |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Embien Technologies |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Embien Technologies (Not published) vs Very (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Embien Technologies |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Embien Technologies vs Very
| Use case | Embien Technologies fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded device requiring a custom touchscreen GUI | Strong | Limited | Embien Technologies |
| IoT product needing a device-management platform alongside firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Embien Technologies vs Very
Embien Technologies (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Builds its own GUI library and IoT device-management platform, giving it deeper tooling than a pure services vendor.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Embien Technologies vs Very FAQ
Is Embien Technologies better than Very?
Embien Technologies (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Embien Technologies's strongest advantage: maintains proprietary GUI and IoT tooling rather than relying solely on third-party libraries. Very's strongest advantage: repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal.
How do Embien Technologies and Very differ in pricing?
Embien Technologies uses product engineering and digital transformation services pricing. Very uses iot product development engagements from concept through deployment pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Embien Technologies or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Embien Technologies and Very?
Embien Technologies's primary differentiator is: builds its own GUI library and IoT device-management platform, giving it deeper tooling than a pure services vendor. Very's primary differentiator is: fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. They also differ in team size (63 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Industrial automation vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.